Every shipper wants to reduce shipping costs. It’s a no-brainer for improving the bottom line and growing margins, and all too often, we see businesses look for a “magic bullet” to decrease hard costs, i.e. negotiating better rates, threatening to leave carriers, or introduce new carriers. These are all valid and great ways to reduce shipping costs, but the real spending problem may be closer to home than you think. Tariff based shipping charges account for 80% of shipping expenses so hard costs are definitely an okay place start. But a lot more goes into your shipping rates than the carrier tariff. In fact 20%, and sometimes more, of true shipping costs actually lie in soft costs. In addition, a portion of the 80% hard costs are frequently attributed to soft cost policies and behaviors.
Shipping is the greatest non-COGS expense and it’s growing more than 5% each year. As costs increase, companies need to be more vigilant about identifying areas for shipping cost savings and fulfillment process optimization. But what does this actually look like? And how are these soft costs uncovered?
To truly understand everything that contributes to shipping costs, let’s examine the life of an order.
Order fulfillment is a long and expensive process that touches every aspect of your business:
If an expense is related to shipping but is not a direct shipping cost, it can be considered a "soft cost." Items like labor, refunds, fulfillment, customer service, damages, errors, exceptions and returns can all fall under this category.
Every company’s internal processes are a little bit unique, but they all have similarities. Let’s look at an average order fulfillment process.
The customer order is the most important stage of the sales process and the fulfillment process. It is easy to treat order acquisition as a stage that is only impacted by sales, but the teams responsible for order fulfillment (Operations, Customer Service, Finance) are all responsible for key components of the buying process.
The easiest way to see the responsibility they bear is to consider the information the customer requires before completing the transaction. A few examples include:
It is imperative that potential customers have access to all relevant data before the sale is completed. And these teams (Operations, Customer Service, Finance) must make sure that data is available and accurate. In addition, they must follow through on the promises made in those deal terms or customers won’t return. So in many cases, the impact of the fulfillment process is felt before the sale is even made.
System connections are vital to successful, low-cost order fulfillment. Standard systems usually include:
Most companies run an ERP alongside an eCommerce platform of some kind. Many also run a WMS and a TMS.
Automation starts with the flow of the order data from the commerce platform into the other systems for processing. It is not possible to completely automate fulfillment if the systems are not connected. Modern APIs and plugins make these connections easy and fast for most shippers.
NOTE: Every company should run some level of TMS as software for running logistics has been proven to lower shipping costs and is available in all sizes and costs, including free.
$ Ideal scenario 1 - the pick list automatically prints details and location of items in the order
$ Ideal scenario 2 - the warehouse team uses a handheld device to identify and locate the contents of the order
$$$ Costly scenario - the warehouse team has to manually print documentation
Content Identification DetailsWhat happens after the order has been finalized? The customer clicked buy, the money transfer was initiated, and now the order must be shipped.
There are 5 levels of order fulfillment automation that shippers can choose from. Each level provides a little more automation than the preceding level. And each level impacts the next five steps of the order fulfillment process.
A level one automation is a completely manual process where a level 5 automation is a completely automated process. Usually, a shipper’s fulfillment labor costs are directly correlated to the fulfillment automation level employed in their warehouse(s).
$ Ideal scenario - Items are scanned for confirmation
$$$ Costly scenario - Items are manually confirmed
Order Picking DetailsThis step is frequently referred to as “pick-and-pack.” Although we separate pick-and-pack into multiple stages, it starts with pulling the order from the shelves.
There are multiple methods for generating the pick list:
This step can look different at every warehouse:
$ Ideal scenario - The software used for order management sends the order data into the shipping software which speaks directly to a box making machine like Packsize and the box was cut and assembled along with an automated pick ticket and shipping label
$$ Acceptable scenario 1 - The shipping software ingested the order data and calculated the optimal box for the order and indicated the box code on the pick slip.
$$ Acceptable scenario 2 - A simple algorithm or spreadsheet cubed out each item in the order and suggested a box size.
$$$ Costly scenario 1 - The warehouse team looks at the items order and makes their best guess as to the smallest box to use based on predefined rule.
$$$ Costly scenario 2 - The warehouse team selects a box by what looks the best or is closest at hand.
Container Selection DetailsAfter items are picked, the order moves to packaging selection. The first step is to select the right shipping box. With a manual strategy, a staff member looks at the ordered items, maybe measures, and chooses a box by eyeballing the options. With this method, it's impossible to determine whether this was the most efficient choice. This variance affects both the cost of packing materials and the shipping cost since most carriers now employ dimensional pricing.
An automated approach would use software to configure the order when it is placed by the customer. Configuring the order in advance offers several key benefits:
Box selection affects both the cost of packing materials and the shipping cost since most carriers now employ dimensional pricing.
With the right technology solution, you can set a standardized process for choosing the best boxes based on item weight, size, and value. This functionality also supports the ability to combine orders.
$ Ideal scenario - Shipping software calculated proper packing materials and labor cost required for order fulfillment.
$$ Acceptable scenario - Order is packed according to documented packing standards.
$$$ Costly scenario - Warehouse team packs the order using the “best guess” method.
Order Packing DetailsSelecting the box is the first step in packing an order. Additional materials are required to wrap and/or pad the items so the meet the carrier’s packing requirements and are eligible for cargo insurance. Materials should be programmatically assigned and measured for cost analysis and to support programmatically generating final packed weights and dimensions.
Calculate labor by order while taking into account materials usage and the labor required to utilize different material times. Not only does this help to determine the portion of the true shipping cost that is related to labor, it also serves as a benchmark from which to measure and track labor utilization.
$ Ideal scenario 1 - The shipping software calculated the final weights and dims before the order was picked and the label was printed out at the same time as the pick slip and the box.
$ Ideal scenario 2 - A dimensioner is used to auto calculate and enter the packed weights and dimensions.
$$$ Costly scenario 1- The warehouse team manually weighs and measures the box and keys in the figures before printing out the label.
$$$ Costly scenario 2 - The warehouse team does not enter final weights and dimensions and uses the quoted or default data which will cause invoice discrepancies that finance must reconcile.
Carrier selection/Label Printing DetailsAs noted above, there are many options for carrier selection starting with manually keying in the final package weight and dimensions, populating a list of possible carriers, and selecting one based on the requirements of each specific order. Not only is this process time consuming, but it is also proven to increase the shipping cost.
One of the most popular shipper requests is to remove order-by-order decision making from the warehouse team. Fulfillment automation allows shippers to set rules to automatically select the best carrier. This may be the cheapest or it may be the least expensive once additional factors like on time delivery performance and damage are factored in. Carrier selection workflows can be eliminated no matter how many carriers are involved.
The best way to keep shipping costs to a minimum is to use preset business shipping rules to define carrier selection criteria and then to automate the selection for every order. The system can account for far more variables than a human, and the system is not swayed by preference. The variables that must be considered when selecting a carrier include:
The lowest shipping price will only be realized when all relevant components are factored into the query. And even if the shipper uses only a few carriers, the best carrier will change based on each order’s unique characteristics.
When ShipHawk examined delivery times from hundreds of thousands of 2-day shipments, we found that USPS Priority Mail frequently outperformed both FedEx and UPS 2-day services.
There are several options for carrier notification and dispatch:
Once the carrier has been chosen, the order information needs to be entered into the proper carrier system so they know when the shipment will be available for pickup. Even if a recurring pickup is scheduled, the shipment data must still be communicated to the carrier so they send the right equipment to pick up the shipments.
$ Ideal scenario - Carrier was programmatically selected based on numerous factors including lowest tariff price, delivery time, damage rates, and recent carrier performance by lane.
$$ Acceptable scenario - Carrier was programmatically selected based on a basic multi-carrier rate comparison
$$$ Costly scenario - Carrier was manually selected.
Carrier Pickup DetailsThere are several additional carrier pickup pitfalls shippers need to be aware of:
$ Ideal scenario - The shipping software is integrated with your ERP and automatically feeds the order, tracking, and inventory data back to the ERP.
$$$ Costly scenario 1- The shipping software is integrated with your ERP, but does not automatically feed all data back to the ERP requiring manual inputs.
$$$ Costly scenario 2 - The shipping software is not integrated with the WMS or ERP and all order, tracking and inventory data must be manually keyed.
Data Synchronization DetailsToday's customers want to know order status immediately and they want to be kept up-to-date on every stage of the shipment. Most carriers provide shippers with a tracking number for generic shipment status updates. Sending customers to the carrier website is a manual and inefficient way of updating customers.
The alternative most shippers are moving to is to provide buyers with a branded, on-site tracking experience. Automated push notifications can send customers updated tracking information based on their preferences. This gives customers a greater sense of control over the shopping experience and leads to more repeat purchases. Not only does tracking enhancement save the time and energy it would take to deliver information but it also optimizes the end user experience of the brand.
$ Ideal scenario - The shipping software kept a record of all the order characteristics for rapid reconciliation. The software reported unexpected charges instantly so the finance team can make system adjustments before losses mount.
$$ Acceptable scenario - The shipping software produced reconciliation reports to be compared against carrier invoices 30-45 days later.
$$$ Costly scenario - Finance receives carrier bills 30-45 days later and does their best to make manual adjustments to the OMS, ERP, WMS and/or shipping software to account for the unexpected charges and prevent them from happening again.
Invoice Reconciliation DetailsA sharp-eyed accountant knows how to match the information on bank statements with carrier invoices. But, there's no need to pay for more accounting fees than you need to.
The insights provided by a quality transportation management system ensure accurate data in real time. In addition, original shipment quote criteria and carrier prices are stored so they can be automatically referenced when the carrier invoice is received. As with other processes, shipping software can remove or reduce human error that can add additional costs to the invoice reconciliation cost.
When the carrier says the shipment criteria is different than the criteria submitted in the quote, companies can run into rebills, which can be costly. These changes generally come about due to submission of misinformation about package weight, dimensions, dimensional weight, or freight class. This soft cost is probably one of the least expected that businesses run into. Fortunately, it is avoidable.
A modern transportation management system takes into account all the characteristics of the order and the destination up front so quotes are accurate. The system also stores a record of the quote and the data used for the quote so when carriers try to come back for more money, shippers have the evidence to back up the lower price.
After reviewing the 10 stages of order fulfillment above, I’m sure it is more obvious how soft costs can impact your true shipping costs, but let’s take it a step further and look at a real life example in dollars. Consider this example company.
Annual shipping spend (carrier shipping charges) - $1.8mm
Which equates to:
Annual fulfillment labor expense for parcel - $114,187.50
Annual fulfillment labor expense for LTL - $139,200
“Hidden” soft costs for this customer:
20%, and sometimes more, of true shipping costs actually lie in soft costs. In addition, a portion of the 80% hard costs are frequently attributed to soft cost policies and behaviors.
Defining Soft Shipping Costs
The 10 stages of order fulfillment make it clear that shipping costs include more than just those on the carriers’ tariffs According to our data, fulfillment related costs account for an average of 20% of a company’s total true shipping costs. For some businesses it is much more.
Many of these processes are not routine - meaning there is little or no standardization. Most organizations are using legacy software and processes that rely on dated standards or “best guess” methods which add significant costs to already expensive carrier shipping prices.
The greatest shipping hurdle today is not making minor tweaks to your tariffs; it is finding simple and consistent ways to standardize and automate the order fulfillment process so that:
a) fulfillment costs are low
b) shipping costs are controlled, and...
c) data is accurately reported on both
Fortunately, advancements in technology have kept pace with the rise in popularity of omnichannel commerce. This means that the tools exist to solve these problems. So the questions become: How do we know which tools to use? And how do we deploy them?
You will see two key themes emerge in the sections below and it is important to understand them in advance.
Great effort is put into establishing best practices. Automation guarantees those best practices are employed consistently, across every order. In addition, when done right, automation also allows shippers to skip steps, eliminate manual processes, and cut costs that were necessities of the manual systems it was built to replace.
Without a clear, measured picture of the order fulfillment process, it is impossible to understand the true costs, capacity, or capability of the system. In order to optimize order fulfillment costs and processes, shippers need to have a record of the output of every stage, and the tools for making adjustments.
ShipHawk is a Smart Transportation Management System™ (TMS 2.0™) helping omnichannel retailers, manufacturers, and distributors create data-driven, automated supply chains.The result is radically lower shipping and fulfillment costs.
We built ShipHawk’s TMS 2.0™ to help companies automate order fulfillment and boost profits. As a business looking to save on soft shipping costs and scale your business, our software can help you accelerate growth, increase customer satisfaction, and reduce costs.
ShipHawk's multi-functional platform works with all carrier types, including parcel, freight, LTL, 3PL, home delivery, on-demand, and first mile services. Robust cost controls provide real-time rating, reporting and analytics while enlisting multi-mode optimization that includes packing and dimensional pricing. ShipHawk also delivers an exceptional customer experience with post-purchase tracking and in-cart rating for all inventory types.
ShipHawk Technology
Advanced, state-of-the-art technology makes ShipHawk a natural choice. Our solution provides shippers with more than they might expect from a shipping platform. Here are some of the features you can leverage to your advantage.
When choosing a shipping platform to scale your business, it's crucial to have easy integration with your eCommerce platform and other tools. Fortunately, the ShipHawk system integrates easily with most major platforms. You can find a list of our carrier integrations here and a list of our technology integrations here. Popular integrations include:
Around 20% of true shipping expenses are related to the fulfillment process. These expenses are more significant than you might think. There are many types of soft costs involved with shipping and fulfillment. The answer to saving on soft shipping expenses has one solution across the board - automate processes and use data to make decisions.
ShipHawk's TMS 2.0 provides powerful solutions for your shipping and fulfillment needs. If you want to find out if this is the right platform for you, connect with a ShipHawk representative today.